On Mon, 26 Oct 2020, Xionghu Luo wrote:
>
> On 2020/10/23 18:18, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Oct 2020, Xiong Hu Luo wrote:
> >
> >> Sometimes debug_bb_slim&debug_bb_n_slim is not enough, how about adding
> >> this debug_bb_details&debug_bb_n_details? Or any other similar call
> >> exist
On 2020/10/23 18:18, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2020, Xiong Hu Luo wrote:
>
>> Sometimes debug_bb_slim&debug_bb_n_slim is not enough, how about adding
>> this debug_bb_details&debug_bb_n_details? Or any other similar call
>> existed?
> There's already debug_bb and debug_bb_n in cfg.c
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020, Xiong Hu Luo wrote:
> Sometimes debug_bb_slim&debug_bb_n_slim is not enough, how about adding
> this debug_bb_details&debug_bb_n_details? Or any other similar call
> existed?
There's already debug_bb and debug_bb_n in cfg.c which works on both
RTL and GIMPLE. How about inste
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 04:34:02AM -0500, Xiong Hu Luo wrote:
> Sometimes debug_bb_slim&debug_bb_n_slim is not enough, how about adding
> this debug_bb_details&debug_bb_n_details? Or any other similar call
> existed?
> + dump_bb (stderr, bb, 0, TDF_DETAILS | TDF_BLOCKS);
You can just call this d
