On 12/16/20 1:19 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
OK.  Please consider a more through description in invoke.texi
though.  What unsupported feature are we warning about and what are the
consequences of not supporting that feature.
Done that and installed the patch.
Thank you for the review,
Martin
On 12/14/20 3:09 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 12/10/20 4:50 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> Most similar warnings mention the sanitizer option rather than
>> referring to the tool by name.  E.g.,
>>
>>    "transactional memory is not supported withÂ
>> %<-fsanitize=address%>"
On 12/10/20 4:50 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Most similar warnings mention the sanitizer option rather than
referring to the tool by name. E.g.,
"transactional memory is not supported with %<-fsanitize=address%>"
or
"%<-fsanitize=leak%> is incompatible with %<-fsanitize=thread%>"
For the sa
On 12/9/20 2:24 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
The newly added warning is about warning a user
that std::atomic_thread_fence is not supported by TSAN.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR sanitizer
