On Sep 25, 2014, at 1:02 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> IMO, these should be converted to dg-additional-options.
>>
>> That would be something like following, except that compat framework doesn't
>> support dg-additional-options:
>> WARNING: compat.exp does not support dg-additional-options
>
> Rain
On 09/25/14 01:01, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
I've noticed that lots of g++ struct-layout-1.exp tests now fail
on ppc*. The problem is the psABI warning:
the layout of aggregates containing vectors with N-byte alignment
For various targets we are using -Wno-abi (and, in C
struct-layout-1.exp also
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > I've noticed that lots of g++ struct-layout-1.exp tests now fail
>> > on ppc*. The problem is the psABI warning:
>> > the layout of aggregates containing vectors with N-byte alignment
>> > For various targets we are using -Wno-abi (and,
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > I've noticed that lots of g++ struct-layout-1.exp tests now fail
>> > on ppc*. The problem is the psABI warning:
>> > the layout of aggregates containing vectors with N-byte alignment
>> > For various targets we are using -Wno-abi (and,
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:29:52AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > I've noticed that lots of g++ struct-layout-1.exp tests now fail
> > on ppc*. The problem is the psABI warning:
> > the layout of aggregates containing vectors with N-byte alignment
> > For various targets we are using -W
Hello!
> I've noticed that lots of g++ struct-layout-1.exp tests now fail
> on ppc*. The problem is the psABI warning:
> the layout of aggregates containing vectors with N-byte alignment
> For various targets we are using -Wno-abi (and, in C
> struct-layout-1.exp also by default) for this, so the
