On 2012.11.29 at 11:26 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 07:24:38PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> >> On 11/29/2012 06:36 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> >> >H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> >>This patch adds --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 3:52 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:20:39PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 07:24:38PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> >> On 11/29/2012 06:36 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:20:39PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 07:24:38PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> >> On 11/29/2012 06:36 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> >> >H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> >>This patch adds --with-build-confi
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 07:24:38PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> On 11/29/2012 06:36 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>> >H.J. Lu wrote:
>> >>This patch adds --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan support. Tested on
>> >>Linux/x86-64. OK to install?
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 07:24:38PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> On 11/29/2012 06:36 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>> >H.J. Lu wrote:
>> >>This patch adds --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan support. Tested on
>> >>Linux/x86-64. OK to install?
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:03 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:32 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Paolo Carlini
>> wrote:
>>> On 11/29/2012 06:36 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> This patch adds --with-build-config=bootstrap-asa
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 07:24:38PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 11/29/2012 06:36 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> >H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>This patch adds --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan support. Tested on
> >>Linux/x86-64. OK to install?
> >
> >I think that patch has broken bootstrap for me. If I do
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:32 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Paolo Carlini
> wrote:
>> On 11/29/2012 06:36 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>>>
>>> H.J. Lu wrote:
This patch adds --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan support. Tested on
Linux/x86-64. OK to install?
>>
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Paolo Carlini
wrote:
> On 11/29/2012 06:36 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>>
>> H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch adds --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan support. Tested on
>>> Linux/x86-64. OK to install?
>>
>>
>> I think that patch has broken bootstrap for me. If I
On 11/29/2012 06:36 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
H.J. Lu wrote:
This patch adds --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan support. Tested on
Linux/x86-64. OK to install?
I think that patch has broken bootstrap for me. If I do a normal
bootstrap, Stage1 fails with:
libtool: compile: unrecognized opti
H.J. Lu wrote:
Please try this: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg01530.html
I just did locally "git log -2 -p|patch -p1 -R" - and wait until you
sort that out with the patch reviewers, which seemingly didn't like that
patch.
BTW: I am not sure whether it is possible with the cu
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> This patch adds --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan support. Tested on
>> Linux/x86-64. OK to install?
>
>
> I think that patch has broken bootstrap for me. If I do a normal bootstrap,
> Stage1 fails with:
>
> libtool: c
H.J. Lu wrote:
This patch adds --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan support. Tested on
Linux/x86-64. OK to install?
I think that patch has broken bootstrap for me. If I do a normal
bootstrap, Stage1 fails with:
libtool: compile: unrecognized option `-D_GNU_SOURCE'
libtool: compile: Try `libt
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:37:47PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> 2012-11-21 H.J. Lu
>
> * Makefile.def (target_modules): Add bootstrap=true and
> raw_cxx=true to libsanitizer.
> * configure.ac (bootstrap_target_libs): Add libsanitizer.
> * Makefile.in: Regenerated.
> * c
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:06 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Il 19/11/2012 05:35, H.J. Lu ha scritto:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 18/11/2012 00:54, H
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:06 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 19/11/2012 05:35, H.J. Lu ha scritto:
>>> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 18/11/2012 00:54, H.J. Lu ha scritto:
> +@if gcc-bootstrap
> +ifneq ($(fi
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 19/11/2012 05:35, H.J. Lu ha scritto:
>> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Il 18/11/2012 00:54, H.J. Lu ha scritto:
+@if gcc-bootstrap
+ifneq ($(filter bootstrap-asan,$(BUILD_CONFIG)),)
+LIBASAN_LIB
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 03:54:41PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch adds --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan support. OK to
> install?
I suppose this should be also described in gcc/doc/install.texi?
Thanks,
Martin
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> H.J.
> ---
> 2012-11-17 H.J. Lu
>
>
> Does -faddress-sanitizer add a CPP symbol that lets you work around it?
> If not, it's a bug. If so, please make libcpp revert to the dump
> algorithm if said symbol is defined.
Do you mean, does asan compilation cause some special preprocessor
symbol to be defined?
No, asan compilation does
Il 19/11/2012 05:35, H.J. Lu ha scritto:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 18/11/2012 00:54, H.J. Lu ha scritto:
>>> +@if gcc-bootstrap
>>> +ifneq ($(filter bootstrap-asan,$(BUILD_CONFIG)),)
>>> +LIBASAN_LIBS=-B$$r/prev-$(TARGET_SUBDIR)/libsanitizer/asan/.libs
>>> +endi
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 18/11/2012 00:54, H.J. Lu ha scritto:
>> +@if gcc-bootstrap
>> +ifneq ($(filter bootstrap-asan,$(BUILD_CONFIG)),)
>> +LIBASAN_LIBS=-B$$r/prev-$(TARGET_SUBDIR)/libsanitizer/asan/.libs
>> +endif
>> +@endif gcc-bootstrap
>
> Do you need this
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 18/11/2012 16:59, Hans-Peter Nilsson ha scritto:
> > Nice, but I agree with the other poster that this'd IMHO be
> > better as --enable-checking=asan (or actually,
> > --enable-checking=all,asan).
>
> Yeah, that's a good thing to support too. However,
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> > Il 18/11/2012 00:54, H.J. Lu ha scritto:
>> >> +@if gcc-bootstrap
>> >> +ifneq ($(filter bootstrap-asan,$(BUILD_CONFIG)),)
>> >> +LIBASAN_
Il 18/11/2012 16:59, Hans-Peter Nilsson ha scritto:
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Il 18/11/2012 00:54, H.J. Lu ha scritto:
+@if gcc-bootstrap
+ifneq ($(filter bootstrap-asan,$(BUILD_CONFIG)),)
+LIBASAN_LIBS=-B$$r/p
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Il 18/11/2012 00:54, H.J. Lu ha scritto:
> >> +@if gcc-bootstrap
> >> +ifneq ($(filter bootstrap-asan,$(BUILD_CONFIG)),)
> >> +LIBASAN_LIBS=-B$$r/prev-$(TARGET_SUBDIR)/libsanitizer/asan/.libs
> >> +endi
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 18/11/2012 00:54, H.J. Lu ha scritto:
>> +@if gcc-bootstrap
>> +ifneq ($(filter bootstrap-asan,$(BUILD_CONFIG)),)
>> +LIBASAN_LIBS=-B$$r/prev-$(TARGET_SUBDIR)/libsanitizer/asan/.libs
>> +endif
>> +@endif gcc-bootstrap
>
> Do you need this
Il 18/11/2012 00:54, H.J. Lu ha scritto:
> +@if gcc-bootstrap
> +ifneq ($(filter bootstrap-asan,$(BUILD_CONFIG)),)
> +LIBASAN_LIBS=-B$$r/prev-$(TARGET_SUBDIR)/libsanitizer/asan/.libs
> +endif
> +@endif gcc-bootstrap
Do you need this to be here? POSTSTAGE1_*_EXPORT is only used when
bootstrapping,
On 2012.11.17 at 15:54 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch adds --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan support. OK to
> install?
Wouldn't it make more sense to add an "--enable-checking=asan" option
instead?
--
Markus
28 matches
Mail list logo