On 07/03/14 09:03, Richard Biener wrote:
Btw, can you check the attached as well? It makes sure all TUs
have -fshort-double set consistently and it automatically enables
it at link-time, not allowing to override the setting.
If it works for you please check it in, too. (I can't really test it
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Paulo Matos wrote:
>> On 06/03/14 11:19, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Paulo Matos
>>> wrote:
On 05/03/2014 11:51, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, M
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Paulo Matos wrote:
> On 06/03/14 11:19, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Paulo Matos
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/03/2014 11:51, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Dominique Dhumieres
wrote:
On 06/03/14 11:19, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Paulo Matos wrote:
On 05/03/2014 11:51, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Dominique Dhumieres
wrote:
Revision 208312 causes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60427
Uhm. pointer co
On 06/03/2014 11:19, Richard Biener wrote:
I have reverted the patch for now.
Richard.
That's fine Richard, thanks. I got stuck with another issue in the
meantime but I will look at it again very soon.
--
Paulo Matos
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Paulo Matos wrote:
> On 05/03/2014 11:51, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Dominique Dhumieres
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Revision 208312 causes
>>>
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60427
>>
>>
>> Uhm. pointer comparison agai
On 05/03/2014 11:51, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Dominique Dhumieres
wrote:
Revision 208312 causes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60427
Uhm. pointer comparison against double_type_node ...
I'd say we want to revert the patch. Paulo, please do that.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
>
> Revision 208312 causes
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60427
Uhm. pointer comparison against double_type_node ...
I'd say we want to revert the patch. Paulo, please do that. Let's
do the alternate approach of mark
Revision 208312 causes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60427
Also compiling the test gcc.dg/lto/pr55113 with -m32 gives an ICE
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr55113 c_lto_pr55113_0.o assemble, -flto -fshort-double -O0
(internal compiler error)
internal compiler error: in layout_type, at stor
"Paulo J. Matos" writes:
> On 04/03/14 11:16, Richard Biener wrote:
>> It works fine on i386 for me but fails on x86_64. Please add a
>>
>> /* { dg-skip-if "PR-you-open" { { x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* } && lp64 } {
>> "*" } { "" } } */
>>
>> to the testcase to avoid the regression in the testsuite.
>>
On 04/03/14 11:16, Richard Biener wrote:
It works fine on i386 for me but fails on x86_64. Please add a
/* { dg-skip-if "PR-you-open" { { x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* } && lp64 } {
"*" } { "" } } */
to the testcase to avoid the regression in the testsuite.
Apologies, you're right. I meant x86_64 fai
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> On 03/03/14 09:56, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> Index: gcc/c-family/c.opt
>> ===
>> --- gcc/c-family/c.opt (revision 208249)
>> +++ gcc/c-family/c.opt (working copy)
>> @@ -114
On 03/03/14 09:56, Richard Biener wrote:
Index: gcc/c-family/c.opt
===
--- gcc/c-family/c.opt (revision 208249)
+++ gcc/c-family/c.opt (working copy)
@@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ C++ ObjC++ Optimization Var(flag_rtti) I
Generate run tim
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
>
> This patch fixes lto/55113 for powerpc.
> Combining -fshort-double with -flto is now working fine.
>
> I attach patch and testcase (unsure if testcase is in the right place).
> Tested with target powerpc-abispe.
>
>
> 2014-03-01 Paulo Mat
14 matches
Mail list logo
