On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 09:37:48 PDT (-0700), Patrick O'Neill wrote:
On 9/15/23 01:49, Kito Cheng via Gcc-patches wrote:
I guess another solution is using reg_or_subregno instead of REGNO, but
that should not catch more cases, and just more run-time check, so this
version is LGTM.
I tested an equi
On 9/15/23 01:49, Kito Cheng via Gcc-patches wrote:
I guess another solution is using reg_or_subregno instead of REGNO, but
that should not catch more cases, and just more run-time check, so this
version is LGTM.
I tested an equivalent patch (without the comment changes).
This patch resolves th
I guess another solution is using reg_or_subregno instead of REGNO, but
that should not catch more cases, and just more run-time check, so this
version is LGTM.