Hi,
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 08:01:41AM -0700, Delesley Hutchins wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately, knowing the original
> declaration doesn't help me; I also need to know the original
> arguments that were passed at the call site, before those arguments
> were removed by ipa-sra.
Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately, knowing the original
declaration doesn't help me; I also need to know the original
arguments that were passed at the call site, before those arguments
were removed by ipa-sra.
> (Of course, ipa-sra removes scalar parameters only when they are not
> used i
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 09:09:24AM -0700, Delesley Hutchins wrote:
> Let's try this again; perhaps I should learn to use e-mail. :-)
>
> This patch fixes an ICE caused when the ipa-sra optimization deletes
> function arguments that are referenced from within a thread safety
> attribute. It
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 15:31, Delesley Hutchins wrote:
> New patch with suggested changes incorporated. Warning now on by
> default, asserts put back if ipa-sra not enabled, and style fixes.
Thanks. I only found two nits: (1) some comments need an extra space
after the final '.', (b) diagnosti
New patch with suggested changes incorporated. Warning now on by
default, asserts put back if ipa-sra not enabled, and style fixes.
-DeLesley
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:41, Delesley Hutchins wrote:
>>> I wonder... how about disabling IPA
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:41, Delesley Hutchins wrote:
>> I wonder... how about disabling IPA-SRA when annotalysis is enabled?
>
> That would certainly make my life a lot easier -- IPA-SRA is not
> really compatible with annotalysis. The only problem I can see is
> that people may be unhappy if
> I wonder... how about disabling IPA-SRA when annotalysis is enabled?
That would certainly make my life a lot easier -- IPA-SRA is not
really compatible with annotalysis. The only problem I can see is
that people may be unhappy if turning on annotalysis makes their code
runs slower. We need a
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:09, Delesley Hutchins wrote:
> Let's try this again; perhaps I should learn to use e-mail. :-)
Well, all you really need is upload-gcc-patch.py from
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/rietveld. We have an internal copy, I'll send
you the location.
> This patch fixes an ICE cause
Let's try this again; perhaps I should learn to use e-mail. :-)
This patch fixes an ICE caused when the ipa-sra optimization deletes
function arguments that are referenced from within a thread safety
attribute. It will attempt to detect this situation and recover
gracefully. Since a graceful re
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 16:48, Delesley Hutchins wrote:
> This patch fixes an ICE caused when the ipa-sra optimization deletes
> function arguments that are referenced from within a thread safety
> attribute. It will attempt to detect this situation and recover
> gracefully. Since a graceful reco
10 matches
Mail list logo
