Re: [PATCH][V2] rs6000: Remove unnecessary option manipulation.

2021-11-12 Thread Martin Liška
On 11/12/21 16:58, Segher Boessenkool wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 03:34:17PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote: On 11/11/21 18:52, Segher Boessenkool wrote: You forgot to send the commit message though? No, the patch is simple so I didn't write any message (except commit title). How is a maintai

Re: [PATCH][V2] rs6000: Remove unnecessary option manipulation.

2021-11-12 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 03:34:17PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote: > On 11/11/21 18:52, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >You forgot to send the commit message though? > > No, the patch is simple so I didn't write any message (except commit title). How is a maintainer supposed to know what the patch is abo

Re: [PATCH][V2] rs6000: Remove unnecessary option manipulation.

2021-11-12 Thread Martin Liška
On 11/11/21 18:52, Segher Boessenkool wrote: Hi! On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 01:36:06PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote: Sending the patch in a separate thread. Hello. You forgot to send the commit message though? No, the patch is simple so I didn't write any message (except commit title).

Re: [PATCH][V2] rs6000: Remove unnecessary option manipulation.

2021-11-11 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi! On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 01:36:06PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote: > Sending the patch in a separate thread. You forgot to send the commit message though? > * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_override_options_after_change): > Do not set flag_rename_registers, it's already enabled with >

Re: [PATCH][V2] rs6000: Remove unnecessary option manipulation.

2021-11-11 Thread Martin Liška
PING^1 On 11/4/21 13:36, Martin Liška wrote: Sending the patch in a separate thread. Ready for master? Cheers, Martin gcc/ChangeLog: * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_override_options_after_change): Do not set flag_rename_registers, it's already enabled with EnabledBy(funroll