Re: [PATCH][RFC] c-family: Implement __has_feature and __has_extension [PR60512]

2023-07-06 Thread Iain Sandoe
Hi Alex, > On 6 Jul 2023, at 15:01, Alex Coplan wrote: > > On 20/06/2023 15:08, Iain Sandoe wrote: >> again, thanks for working on this and for fixing the SDK blocker. >> >>> On 20 Jun 2023, at 13:30, Alex Coplan wrote: >>> >> >>> The patch can now survive bootstrap on Darwin (it looks like

Re: [PATCH][RFC] c-family: Implement __has_feature and __has_extension [PR60512]

2023-07-06 Thread Alex Coplan via Gcc-patches
Hi Iain, On 20/06/2023 15:08, Iain Sandoe wrote: > Hi Alex > > again, thanks for working on this and for fixing the SDK blocker. > > > On 20 Jun 2023, at 13:30, Alex Coplan wrote: > > > > > The patch can now survive bootstrap on Darwin (it looks like we'll need > > to adjust some Objective-C+

Re: [PATCH][RFC] c-family: Implement __has_feature and __has_extension [PR60512]

2023-07-06 Thread Alex Coplan via Gcc-patches
Hi Jason, On 11/05/2023 16:25, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 5/9/23 08:07, Alex Coplan wrote: > > This patch implements clang's __has_feature and __has_extension in GCC. > > Thanks! Thanks a lot for the review, I posted a v2 patch incorporating your feedback here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-p

Re: [PATCH][RFC] c-family: Implement __has_feature and __has_extension [PR60512]

2023-06-20 Thread Iain Sandoe
Hi Alex again, thanks for working on this and for fixing the SDK blocker. > On 20 Jun 2023, at 13:30, Alex Coplan wrote: > > The patch can now survive bootstrap on Darwin (it looks like we'll need > to adjust some Objective-C++ tests in light of the new pedwarn, but that > looks to be straight

Re: [PATCH][RFC] c-family: Implement __has_feature and __has_extension [PR60512]

2023-06-20 Thread Alex Coplan via Gcc-patches
Hi Iain, On 14/05/2023 17:05, Iain Sandoe wrote: > Hi Alex, > > thanks for working on this. > > I’ve applied this patch and evaluated on a few Darwin versions (which is the > target currently most affected, I believe): > > > On 9 May 2023, at 13:07, Alex Coplan wrote: > > > This patch impleme

Re: [PATCH][RFC] c-family: Implement __has_feature and __has_extension [PR60512]

2023-05-14 Thread Iain Sandoe
Hi Alex, thanks for working on this. I’ve applied this patch and evaluated on a few Darwin versions (which is the target currently most affected, I believe): > On 9 May 2023, at 13:07, Alex Coplan wrote: > This patch implements clang's __has_feature and __has_extension in GCC. Thanks, this bl

Re: [PATCH][RFC] c-family: Implement __has_feature and __has_extension [PR60512]

2023-05-11 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 21:25, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 5/9/23 08:07, Alex Coplan wrote: > > This patch implements clang's __has_feature and __has_extension in GCC. > > Thanks! > > > Currently the patch aims to implement all documented features (and some > > undocumented ones) following the docum

Re: [PATCH][RFC] c-family: Implement __has_feature and __has_extension [PR60512]

2023-05-11 Thread Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
On 5/9/23 08:07, Alex Coplan wrote: This patch implements clang's __has_feature and __has_extension in GCC. Thanks! Currently the patch aims to implement all documented features (and some undocumented ones) following the documentation at https://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html wit