RE: [PATCH][MIPS] P5600 scheduling

2014-06-05 Thread Andrew Bennett
> FWIW, since regenerated files are often not posted as part of the patch, > I'd just assumed the committer would do that. I should have checked the > changelog though... Thats fine. I will remember in future not to include regenerated files in my patches. > > > Secondly, I have changed invoke

Re: [PATCH][MIPS] P5600 scheduling

2014-06-04 Thread Richard Sandiford
s@gcc.gnu.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH][MIPS] P5600 scheduling >> >> Jaydeep Patil writes: >> > Please refer to the attached patch files. >> > >> > gcc-p5600-noMSA.patch >> > TARGET_P5600 has been removed >> >> Sorry, noticed o

RE: [PATCH][MIPS] P5600 scheduling

2014-06-04 Thread Andrew Bennett
> -Original Message- > From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On > Behalf Of Richard Sandiford > Sent: 28 May 2014 10:42 > To: Jaydeep Patil > Cc: Rich Fuhler; Matthew Fortune; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH][M

Re: [PATCH][MIPS] P5600 scheduling

2014-05-28 Thread Richard Sandiford
ter code, it'd be interesting to understand why. Thanks, Richard > -Original Message- > From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:rdsandif...@googlemail.com] > Sent: 25 May 2014 PM 04:18 > To: Jaydeep Patil > Cc: Rich Fuhler; Matthew Fortune; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re:

RE: [PATCH][MIPS] P5600 scheduling

2014-05-27 Thread Jaydeep Patil
][MIPS] P5600 scheduling Jaydeep Patil writes: > Hi Richard, > > Please refer to the attached patch files. > > gcc-p5600-noMSA.patch > The patch implements P5600 pipeline and scheduling for GP and FPU > instructions. This patch is OK, thanks. Generally (i.e. when I rememb

Re: [PATCH][MIPS] P5600 scheduling

2014-05-25 Thread Richard Sandiford
Jaydeep Patil writes: > Hi Richard, > > Please refer to the attached patch files. > > gcc-p5600-noMSA.patch > The patch implements P5600 pipeline and scheduling for GP and FPU > instructions. This patch is OK, thanks. Generally (i.e. when I remember to check) we don't define TARGET_* options

RE: [PATCH][MIPS] P5600 scheduling

2014-05-22 Thread Jaydeep Patil
2014 PM 08:23 To: Jaydeep Patil Cc: Rich Fuhler; Matthew Fortune; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][MIPS] P5600 scheduling Hi Jaydeep, Thanks for the write-up and updated patches. I'll try to get to them this weekend. In the meantime... Jaydeep Patil writes: > The -msche

Re: [PATCH][MIPS] P5600 scheduling

2014-05-22 Thread Richard Sandiford
Richard Sandiford writes: > Yeah, this sounds similar to what I was seeing for Cortex-A8 > with the default -fsched-pressure (which is tuned for and known > to work well on x86). Did you try with: > > -fsched-pressure --param sched-pressure-heuristic=2 Gah, sched-pressure-algorithm rather than

Re: [PATCH][MIPS] P5600 scheduling

2014-05-22 Thread Richard Sandiford
Hi Jaydeep, Thanks for the write-up and updated patches. I'll try to get to them this weekend. In the meantime... Jaydeep Patil writes: > The -msched-weight option: > We are using ~650 hot-spot functions from VP9/VP8/H264/MPEG4 codes > available to us as a test suite. The default Haifa-schedu

RE: [PATCH][MIPS] P5600 scheduling

2014-05-22 Thread Jaydeep Patil
...@googlemail.com] Sent: 20 May 2014 AM 02:37 To: Jaydeep Patil Cc: Rich Fuhler; Matthew Fortune Subject: Re: [PATCH][MIPS] P5600 scheduling Jaydeep Patil writes: > Please refer to the attached patch which implements P5600 pipeline and > scheduling for GP and FPU instructions. > > Target op