Re: [PATCH][ARM] Make issue rate part of per-core tuning structs

2015-04-23 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
On 14/04/15 20:09, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi all, This is an update to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02706.html, rebased on top of the new cores that went in since that time. It's just a refactoring. Bootstrapped an

Re: [PATCH][ARM] Make issue rate part of per-core tuning structs

2015-04-14 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > Hi all, > > This is an update to > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02706.html, > rebased on top of the new cores that went in since that time. > > It's just a refactoring. > > Bootstrapped and tested on arm-linux. > > Ok for tr

Re: [PATCH][ARM] Make issue rate part of per-core tuning structs

2015-01-16 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 16/01/15 13:46, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > Hi, > > This is a ping and a question. > Now that the xgene1 support has gone in, is it ok if I update this patch > to include the xgene tuning struct? Will it still be acceptable for GCC5? > In principle, that should be OK. It's just work to make the

Re: [PATCH][ARM] Make issue rate part of per-core tuning structs

2015-01-16 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
Hi, This is a ping and a question. Now that the xgene1 support has gone in, is it ok if I update this patch to include the xgene tuning struct? Will it still be acceptable for GCC5? Thanks, Kyrill On 09/01/15 11:32, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Ping. Thanks, Kyrill On 12/12/14 13:57, Kyrill Tkach

Re: [PATCH][ARM] Make issue rate part of per-core tuning structs

2015-01-09 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
Ping. Thanks, Kyrill On 12/12/14 13:57, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Ping (after the macro fusion patch)... https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02706.html Thanks, Kyrill On 20/11/14 16:48, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: I should say that the patch context depends on the macro fusion hook implementat

Re: [PATCH][ARM] Make issue rate part of per-core tuning structs

2014-12-12 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
Ping (after the macro fusion patch)... https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02706.html Thanks, Kyrill On 20/11/14 16:48, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: I should say that the patch context depends on the macro fusion hook implementation posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg0

Re: [PATCH][ARM] Make issue rate part of per-core tuning structs

2014-11-20 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
I should say that the patch context depends on the macro fusion hook implementation posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg00958.html Kyrill On 20/11/14 16:43, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi all, This patch makes the arm_issue_rate function lookup the issue rate of the process f