On 27/11/14 23:53, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Thursday 2014-11-27 11:09, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Thanks for the review. The invoke.texi changes were posted and
approved at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02683.html
and I'm attaching the proposed changes.html patch.
Looks good.
Note
On Thursday 2014-11-27 11:09, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Thanks for the review. The invoke.texi changes were posted and
approved at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02683.html
and I'm attaching the proposed changes.html patch.
Looks good.
Note that once you have "has been added" and o
On 27/11/14 11:09, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 27/11/14 08:52, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This patch adds support for the Cortex-A17 processor to the arm backend.
Cortex-A17 is an ARMv7ve core with the same architectural features
On 27/11/14 08:52, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This patch adds support for the Cortex-A17 processor to the arm backend.
Cortex-A17 is an ARMv7ve core with the same architectural features as the
Cortex-A7, A12 and A15 cores.
The -m
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch adds support for the Cortex-A17 processor to the arm backend.
> Cortex-A17 is an ARMv7ve core with the same architectural features as the
> Cortex-A7, A12 and A15 cores.
> The -m{tune, cpu}=cortex-a17 option is added a
New -mcpu= values need documenting in invoke.texi.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
