On Friday 2014-12-19 10:24, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg00947.html
>> This patch almost certainly falls under the obvious rule:
> Yeah, one could almost make an argument that it's a typo fix.
> Committed as r218897.
I am not a big fan of stretching the c
On 18/12/14 17:37, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 05:18:18PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg00947.html
This patch almost certainly falls under the obvious rule:
"will the person who objects to my work the most be able to
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 05:18:18PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Ping.
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg00947.html
This patch almost certainly falls under the obvious rule:
"will the person who objects to my work the most be able to
find a fault with my fix?"
ARM hasn't stoo
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg00947.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 10/12/14 16:50, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
The company ARM is not Advanced RISC Machines anymore and anyway the ARM
architecture is distinct from the company.
This patch adjusts the documentation accordingly.
O
