On 20/04/15 12:03, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> On 18/04/15 15:18, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> On 15/04/15 16:22, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> This patch goes through the arm backend and replaces expressions of the
>>> form
>>> a >= lo && a <= hi with IN_RANGE (a, lo, hi) which is that ti
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 12:03:11PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> The definition and comment on IN_RANGE in system.h is:
> /* A macro to determine whether a VALUE lies inclusively within a
>certain range without evaluating the VALUE more than once. This
>macro won't warn if the VALUE is un
On 18/04/15 15:18, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 15/04/15 16:22, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This patch goes through the arm backend and replaces expressions of the
form
a >= lo && a <= hi with IN_RANGE (a, lo, hi) which is that tiny bit smaller
and easier to read in my opinion. I guess there's
On 15/04/15 16:22, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch goes through the arm backend and replaces expressions of the
> form
> a >= lo && a <= hi with IN_RANGE (a, lo, hi) which is that tiny bit smaller
> and easier to read in my opinion. I guess there's also a chance it might
> make
> th
