Re: [PATCH][AArch64 Intrinsics] Replace temporary assembler for vst1_lane

2015-04-14 Thread Alan Lawrence
Marcus Shawcroft wrote: On 30 January 2015 at 12:09, Alan Lawrence wrote: This was posted towards the end of stage 3, a few days before stage 4 started. Is it now too late to "ping" ? --Alan gcc/ChangeLog: * config/aarch64/arm_neon.h (vst1_lane_f32, vst1_lane_f64, vst1_lane

Re: [PATCH][AArch64 Intrinsics] Replace temporary assembler for vst1_lane

2015-01-30 Thread Marcus Shawcroft
On 30 January 2015 at 12:09, Alan Lawrence wrote: > This was posted towards the end of stage 3, a few days before stage 4 > started. Is it now too late to "ping" ? > > --Alan >> gcc/ChangeLog: >> >> * config/aarch64/arm_neon.h (vst1_lane_f32, vst1_lane_f64, >> vst1_lane_p8, vst1_l

Re: [PATCH][AArch64 Intrinsics] Replace temporary assembler for vst1_lane

2015-01-30 Thread Alan Lawrence
This was posted towards the end of stage 3, a few days before stage 4 started. Is it now too late to "ping" ? --Alan Alan Lawrence wrote: Nowadays, just storing the (bigendian-corrected) vector element to the address, generates exactly the same assembler for all cases except {float,int,uint}6