Re: [PATCH][AArch64] Use implementation namespace consistently in arm_neon.h

Hi all, On 2/6/19 1:52 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: [resending with patch compressed] Hi all, We're somewhat inconsistent in arm_neon.h when it comes to using the implementation namespace for local identifiers. This means things like: #define hash_abcd 0 #define hash_e 1 #define wk 2 #include

Re: [PATCH][AArch64] Use implementation namespace consistently in arm_neon.h

Ping. Thanks, Kyrill On 2/15/19 11:52 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Ping. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/msg00345.html Thanks, Kyrill On 2/6/19 1:52 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: [resending with patch compressed] Hi all, We're somewhat inconsistent in arm_neon.h when it comes to us

Re: [PATCH][AArch64] Use implementation namespace consistently in arm_neon.h

Ping. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/msg00345.html Thanks, Kyrill On 2/6/19 1:52 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: [resending with patch compressed] Hi all, We're somewhat inconsistent in arm_neon.h when it comes to using the implementation namespace for local identifiers. This means

Re: [PATCH][AArch64] Use implementation namespace consistently in arm_neon.h

Hi James, On 06/02/19 17:27, James Greenhalgh wrote: On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 07:52:42AM -0600, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: [resending with patch compressed] Hi all, We're somewhat inconsistent in arm_neon.h when it comes to using the implementation namespace for local identifiers. This means thing

Re: [PATCH][AArch64] Use implementation namespace consistently in arm_neon.h

On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 07:52:42AM -0600, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > [resending with patch compressed] > > Hi all, > > We're somewhat inconsistent in arm_neon.h when it comes to using the > implementation namespace for local > identifiers. This means things like: > #define hash_abcd 0 > #define has