On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 09:20:55AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Our sub3_compare1 pattern is not enough to catch cases where we
> subtract an immediate and compare against in PARALLEL. This is due to the RTL
> canonicalisation rules that require subtractions of immediate IMM be
> rep
Ping.
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 11/05/17 11:14, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-04/msg00932.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 21/04/17 09:20, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
Our sub3_compare1 pattern is not enough to catch cases where we subtract
an immediate
and compare ag
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-04/msg00932.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 21/04/17 09:20, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
Our sub3_compare1 pattern is not enough to catch cases where we subtract
an immediate
and compare against in PARALLEL. This is due to the RTL canonicalisation rules
