James Greenhalgh wrote:
> This seems like a bit of a theoretical issue as we would normally build
> libgcc with -fno-omit-frame-pointer anyway, but it can't hurt to guarantee
> this, so OK.
It's not theoretical since there were multiple users reporting unwinding issues,
so clearly doing CFLAGS="-
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 05:27:37PM +0100, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
>
> ping
This seems like a bit of a theoretical issue as we would normally build
libgcc with -fno-omit-frame-pointer anyway, but it can't hurt to guarantee
this, so OK.
Thanks,
James
> From: Wilco Dijkstra
> Sent: 31 July 2017 16:5
ping
From: Wilco Dijkstra
Sent: 31 July 2017 16:57
To: GCC Patches; James Greenhalgh
Cc: nd
Subject: [PATCH][AArch64] PR71951: Fix unwinding with -fomit-frame-pointer
As described in PR71951, if libgcc is built with -fomit-frame-pointer,
unwinding crashes, for example while doing a backtrac
