OK for 4.7.
Jason
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 21:24 -0400, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 03:22:07PM -0400, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> > The patch just requires some shuffling of logic to catch issues now;
> > below is a version that works for me on the trunk.
> >
> > This new checking does require modifying g+
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 03:22:07PM -0400, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> The patch just requires some shuffling of logic to catch issues now;
> below is a version that works for me on the trunk.
>
> This new checking does require modifying g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for5.C.
>
> Tested with g++ testsuite on x86_64
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 03:25:41PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> FWIW, I tried Janis's patch on 4.6 branch and I got
>
> /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/pr18770.C: In
> function 'void e1()':^M
> /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/pr18770.C:29:11:
> error: redecla
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 22 May 2011, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>> 2010-03-18 Janis Johnson
>>>
>>> gcc/cp
>>> PR c++/2288
>>> PR c++/18770
>>> * name-lookup.h (enum scope_kind): Add sk_cond.
>>> * name-lookup.c (pushdecl_maybe_friend): Get
On Sun, 22 May 2011, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> 2010-03-18 Janis Johnson
>>
>> gcc/cp
>> PR c++/2288
>> PR c++/18770
>> * name-lookup.h (enum scope_kind): Add sk_cond.
>> * name-lookup.c (pushdecl_maybe_friend): Get scope of shadowed local.
>> Detect and report error for re
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 01:50:54PM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> The ISO C++ standard says, in Section 3.3.2 sentence 4, that a name
> declared in the for-init-statement or in the condition of an if, for
> while, or switch statement can't be redeclared in the outermost block
> of the controlled sta
