On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
> On 05/18/2011 10:31 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> Not that I'm too excited to see GCC built with a C++ compiler (or even C++
>> features being used).
>
> Hmmm, you think using "false" as a value for a pointer-returning function is
> just A-O
On 05/18/2011 10:31 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
Not that I'm too excited to see GCC built with a C++ compiler (or even C++
features being used).
Hmmm, you think using "false" as a value for a pointer-returning
function is just A-OK ?
Duh, I'm glad I'm using Fortran, where the programmer isn
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
> On 05/18/2011 05:41 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
>
>>> On 05/17/2011 08:32 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>>
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu {, m32} with --enable-build-with-cxx.
Committe
On 05/18/2011 05:41 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 05/17/2011 08:32 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu {, m32} with --enable-build-with-cxx.
Committed to mainline SVN as obvious.
Does that mean that I can now remove the
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
> On 05/17/2011 08:32 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
>> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu {, m32} with --enable-build-with-cxx.
>> Committed to mainline SVN as obvious.
>
> Does that mean that I can now remove the --disable-werror from my daily C++
> bootst
On 05/17/2011 08:32 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu {, m32} with --enable-build-with-cxx.
Committed to mainline SVN as obvious.
Does that mean that I can now remove the --disable-werror from my daily
C++ bootstrap run ?
It's great that some people understand the intrica
