On 9/18/18 1:52 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Sep 17 2018, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>> On 9/17/18 3:08 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>> PR rtl-optimization/85458
>>> * sel-sched.c (sel_target_adjust_priority): Remove wrong
>>> assertion.
>> Under what conditions is the new priority negative?
On Sep 17 2018, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 9/17/18 3:08 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> PR rtl-optimization/85458
>> * sel-sched.c (sel_target_adjust_priority): Remove wrong
>> assertion.
> Under what conditions is the new priority negative? Without digging
> deep into the ia64 port that j
On 9/17/18 3:08 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> PR rtl-optimization/85458
> * sel-sched.c (sel_target_adjust_priority): Remove wrong
> assertion.
Under what conditions is the new priority negative? Without digging
deep into the ia64 port that just seems wrong.
jeff
On Sep 17 2018, John David Anglin wrote:
> On 2018-09-17 5:08 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> PR rtl-optimization/85458
>> * sel-sched.c (sel_target_adjust_priority): Remove wrong
>> assertion.
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/sel-sched.c b/gcc/sel-sched.c
>> index 824f1ec340..1be977d70b 100644
On 2018-09-17 5:08 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
PR rtl-optimization/85458
* sel-sched.c (sel_target_adjust_priority): Remove wrong
assertion.
diff --git a/gcc/sel-sched.c b/gcc/sel-sched.c
index 824f1ec340..1be977d70b 100644
--- a/gcc/sel-sched.c
+++ b/gcc/sel-sched.c
@@ -33
PR rtl-optimization/85458
* sel-sched.c (sel_target_adjust_priority): Remove wrong
assertion.
diff --git a/gcc/sel-sched.c b/gcc/sel-sched.c
index 824f1ec340..1be977d70b 100644
--- a/gcc/sel-sched.c
+++ b/gcc/sel-sched.c
@@ -3330,8 +3330,6 @@ sel_target_adjust_priority (exp
On 2018-09-10 8:35 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Sep 06 2018, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/03/2018 08:32 AM, John David Anglin wrote:
The documentation for TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_PRIORITY indicates that the
hook can
reduce the priority of INSN to execute it later. The hppa hook only
reduces the priorit
On Sep 06 2018, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 09/03/2018 08:32 AM, John David Anglin wrote:
>> The documentation for TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_PRIORITY indicates that the
>> hook can
>> reduce the priority of INSN to execute it later. The hppa hook only
>> reduces the priority
>> and it has been this way for y
On 09/03/2018 08:32 AM, John David Anglin wrote:
> The documentation for TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_PRIORITY indicates that the
> hook can
> reduce the priority of INSN to execute it later. The hppa hook only
> reduces the priority
> and it has been this way for years. However, the assert in
> sel_targe