On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 05:04:37PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > Why did you use check_runtime_nocache btw? Is that just copy-paste?
>
> Just copy-paste.
>
> Like the target_clones stuff, right now, it is only x86 and PowerPC that
> supports __builtin_cpu*.
>
> I don't really see the point
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 03:48:50PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> As Peter said, I'd rather test for "ppc32", so this works anywhere.
Fair enough.
> That would give
>
> proc check_cpu_supports_available { } {
> if { [istarget powerpc*-*-*] } {
> return [check_runtime cpu_supports
Hi!
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 07:53:21PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> --- gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp (revision 249606)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp (working copy)
> @@ -1930,6 +1930,37 @@ proc check_effective_target_powerpc64_no
> } {-O2}]
> }
>
> +# Re
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 09:58:40AM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 6/27/17 6:53 PM, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > This adds a target supports option in dejagnu so that future tests can use
> > this
> > to determine whether or not to test target_clones.
>
> I like the idea, but some comments...
>
On 6/27/17 6:53 PM, Michael Meissner wrote:
> This adds a target supports option in dejagnu so that future tests can use
> this
> to determine whether or not to test target_clones.
I like the idea, but some comments...
> + #ifdef __MACH__
> + asm volatile ("xxlor vs0,
On 06/27/2017 05:53 PM, Michael Meissner wrote:
> The PowerPC __builtin_cpu_supports and __builtin_cpu_is built-in functions
> require GLIBC 2.23, since they use fixed words at the end of thread control
> area to store the HWCAP and HWCAP2 bits. If the compiler was not configured
> with the approp
