On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 10:03:46AM +, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Mar 6, 2015, at 1:45 AM, James Greenhalgh
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 03:37:33PM +, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >>> On 8 February 2015 at 03:24, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 5:02 PM,
> On Mar 6, 2015, at 1:45 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 03:37:33PM +, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>> On 8 February 2015 at 03:24, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>>PR target/64893
>>>* config/aarch
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 03:37:33PM +, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 8 February 2015 at 03:24, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > PR target/64893
> > * config/aarch64/aarch64-builtins.c
> > (aarch64_init_simd_builtins):
> >
On 8 February 2015 at 03:24, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 02:51:43PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
While trying to build the GCC 5 with GCC 5, I ran into an ICE
On 8 February 2015 at 02:24, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Here is the updated patch with Jakub's comments included and added a
> testcase for the 0, 0 case.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
> ChangeLog:
>
> PR target/64893
> * config/aarch64/aarch64-builtins.c (aarch64_init_simd_builtins
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 02:51:43PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> While trying to build the GCC 5 with GCC 5, I ran into an ICE when
>>> building libcpp at -O0. The problem is the C++
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 02:51:43PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> While trying to build the GCC 5 with GCC 5, I ran into an ICE when
>> building libcpp at -O0. The problem is the C++ front-end was not
>> folding sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) when p
> On Feb 3, 2015, at 3:57 AM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
>
>
> Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> While trying to build the GCC 5 with GCC 5, I ran into an ICE when
>> building libcpp at -O0. The problem is the C++ front-end was not
>> folding sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) when passed to a function at -O0. The
>>
Andrew Pinski wrote:
While trying to build the GCC 5 with GCC 5, I ran into an ICE when
building libcpp at -O0. The problem is the C++ front-end was not
folding sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) when passed to a function at -O0. The
C++ front-end keeps around sizeof until the gimplifier and there is no
wa
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 02:51:43PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> While trying to build the GCC 5 with GCC 5, I ran into an ICE when
> building libcpp at -O0. The problem is the C++ front-end was not
> folding sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) when passed to a function at -O0. The
> C++ front-end keeps around
10 matches
Mail list logo