On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 17:28 +0100, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> Completely as an aside: this makes me wonder, whether having and using a
> similar
> macro _inside_ gcc, i.e. for targets to specify the ordering of elements
> within
> a vector independently of BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN, might be a good thing?
>
Completely as an aside: this makes me wonder, whether having and using a similar
macro _inside_ gcc, i.e. for targets to specify the ordering of elements within
a vector independently of BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN, might be a good thing?
--Alan
Bill Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
This adds a macro to indicate the
2014-08-15 Bill Schmidt
* conifg/rs6000/rs6000-c.c (rs6000_cpu_cpp_builtins): Provide
builtin define __VEC_ELEMENT_REG_ORDER__.
Okay.
Thanks, David