On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> > > - Keeping old layout of "mmix_reg_or_8bit_operand". That looked like
> > > a spurious change and I prefer the ior construct to the
> > > if_then_else.
> >
> > ISTR without this change, there were lo
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > Nathan, again thanks. There are a few minor tweaks compared to your
> > version:
>
> Thanks for fixing this up!
>
> > - Keeping old layout of "mmix_reg_or_8bit_operand". That looked like
> > a spurious change and I pref
- Original Message -
> Nathan, again thanks. There are a few minor tweaks compared to your
> version:
Thanks for fixing this up!
> - Keeping old layout of "mmix_reg_or_8bit_operand". That looked like
> a spurious change and I prefer the ior construct to the
> if_then_else.
ISTR wit
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2012, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> Sorry, but I need more time to get
> test-results for a recent trunk revision to a state where
> testing patches makes sense. I'll test the patch and commit
> that or a variant. Thanks for your work.
On Fri, 3 Aug 2012, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> > H-P, if you'd like to test beforehand, that'd be great.
>
> ...yes, I'd like to test this before, please. Thanks for your
> work. (Let's set a timeout at the end of August; ok to commit
> Sep 1 have I not
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> As $SUBJECT says. There's not too much interesting here. I did a
> fairly literal-minded conversion, so it's possible there's smarter ways
> to do some things.
Doesn't look too bad though, but ...
> Compiled with cross to mmix-knuth-mmixware and spot-ch
