Re: [PATCH,fortran] Reap dead code

2011-10-26 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Steve, > Surely, you have Halloween across the Pond, ie., the Grim Reaper. :-) And what, pray, does the Grim Reaper hold??? The patch is OK. Thanks Paul > >> >> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Steve Kargl >> wrote: >> > On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 01:16:14PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: >> >> The

Re: [PATCH,fortran] Reap dead code

2011-10-26 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 09:55:09PM +0200, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > Dear Steve, > > Reaping implies that there is something about it that you want to keep > :-) Surely, weeding or herbicide spraying is better than reaping? Surely, you have Halloween across the Pond, ie., the Grim Reaper. :-)

Re: [PATCH,fortran] Reap dead code

2011-10-26 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Dear Steve, Reaping implies that there is something about it that you want to keep :-) Surely, weeding or herbicide spraying is better than reaping? On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 01:16:14PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: >> The attach patch reaps some

Re: [PATCH,fortran] Reap dead code

2011-10-26 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 01:16:14PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > The attach patch reaps some code that is now dead > due to my recent changes for ishftc in check.c. > Regression tested on i686-*-freebsd. > > 2011-10-22 Steevn G. Kargl > > * simplify.c (gfc_simplify_ishftc): Reap dead code.