On 06/12/17 11:51, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi,
On 4 December 2017 at 18:18, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Since there are no comments, I'll commit it now.
>
> The idea looks interesting but the timing is a bit more questionable.
>
> --
> Eric Botcazou
Since this was committed (r255384), I've noticed
Hi,
On 4 December 2017 at 18:18, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Since there are no comments, I'll commit it now.
>
> The idea looks interesting but the timing is a bit more questionable.
>
> --
> Eric Botcazou
Since this was committed (r255384), I've noticed a regression on
arm-none-linux-gnueabi --wit
> Since there are no comments, I'll commit it now.
The idea looks interesting but the timing is a bit more questionable.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 09:26:37AM +, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> This removes use_crosses_set_p, and uses modified_between_p instead
> everywhere it was used. This improves optimisation. I'm a little bit
> worried it might increase compile time; so far I haven't seen it do
> that though.
>