On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 01:25:18PM +0100, Nix wrote:
> On 10 Jul 2019, Segher Boessenkool spake thusly:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 07:28:12PM +0100, Nix wrote:
> >> On 5 Jul 2019, Richard Biener said:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 12:21 AM Indu Bhagat
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> CTF, at this
On 10 Jul 2019, Segher Boessenkool spake thusly:
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 07:28:12PM +0100, Nix wrote:
>> On 5 Jul 2019, Richard Biener said:
>>
>> > On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 12:21 AM Indu Bhagat wrote:
>> >> CTF, at this time, is type information for entities at global or file
>> >> scope.
>> >
[Sorry for delay: head down in linker plus having nice food poisoning
bouts]
On 9 Jul 2019, Mike Stump verbalised:
> On Jul 5, 2019, at 11:28 AM, Nix wrote:
>> ICTF for the entire Linux kernel is about 6MiB
>
> Any reason why not add CTF to the next dwarf standard? Then, we just
> support the n
On 7/9/19 5:25 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 07:28:12PM +0100, Nix wrote:
>> On 5 Jul 2019, Richard Biener said:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 12:21 AM Indu Bhagat wrote:
CTF, at this time, is type information for entities at global or file
scope.
This can
On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 07:28:12PM +0100, Nix wrote:
> On 5 Jul 2019, Richard Biener said:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 12:21 AM Indu Bhagat wrote:
> >> CTF, at this time, is type information for entities at global or file
> >> scope.
> >> This can be used by online debuggers, program tracers (d
On Jul 5, 2019, at 11:28 AM, Nix wrote:
> ICTF for the entire Linux kernel is about 6MiB
Any reason why not add CTF to the next dwarf standard? Then, we just support
the next dwarf standard. If not, have you started talks with them to add it?
Long term, this is a better solution, as we then g
On 07/04/2019 03:43 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
Hmm...a GCC plugin for CTF generation at compile-time may work out for a single
compilation unit. But I am not sure how will LTO be supported in that case.
Basically, for LTO and -gtLEVEL to work together, I need the lto-wrapper to be
aware of the
On 5 Jul 2019, Jakub Jelinek outgrape:
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 07:28:12PM +0100, Nix wrote:
>> > What makes it superior to DWARF stripped down to the above feature set?
>>
>> Increased compactness. DWARF fundamentally trades off compactness in
>> favour of its regular structure, which makes it
On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 07:28:12PM +0100, Nix wrote:
> > What makes it superior to DWARF stripped down to the above feature set?
>
> Increased compactness. DWARF fundamentally trades off compactness in
> favour of its regular structure, which makes it easier to parse (but not
> easier to interpret
On 5 Jul 2019, Richard Biener said:
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 12:21 AM Indu Bhagat wrote:
>> CTF, at this time, is type information for entities at global or file scope.
>> This can be used by online debuggers, program tracers (dynamic tracing); More
>> generally, it provides type introspection fo
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 12:21 AM Indu Bhagat wrote:
>
> On 07/04/2019 03:43 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 2:36 AM Indu Bhagat wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> RE subset of C : It is true that CTF format currently does leave out a very
> small subset of C like FIXED_POINT as you noted (
On 07/04/2019 03:43 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 2:36 AM Indu Bhagat wrote:
[...]
RE subset of C : It is true that CTF format currently does leave out a very
small subset of C like FIXED_POINT as you noted ( CTF does have representation
for COMPLEX_TYPE, if my code paths cul
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 2:36 AM Indu Bhagat wrote:
>
>
> On 07/03/2019 05:31 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 5:18 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> >> On 7/2/19 11:54 AM, Indu Bhagat wrote:
> >>> Ping.
> >>> Can someone please review these patches ? We would like to get the
> >>> support f
On 07/03/2019 05:31 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 5:18 AM Jeff Law wrote:
On 7/2/19 11:54 AM, Indu Bhagat wrote:
Ping.
Can someone please review these patches ? We would like to get the
support for CTF integrated soon.
I'm not sure there's really even consensus that we wa
On 07/02/2019 08:18 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 7/2/19 11:54 AM, Indu Bhagat wrote:
Ping.
Can someone please review these patches ? We would like to get the
support for CTF integrated soon.
I'm not sure there's really even consensus that we want CTF support in
GCC. Though I think that the change
On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 5:18 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 7/2/19 11:54 AM, Indu Bhagat wrote:
> > Ping.
> > Can someone please review these patches ? We would like to get the
> > support for CTF integrated soon.
> I'm not sure there's really even consensus that we want CTF support in
> GCC. Though I
On 7/2/19 11:54 AM, Indu Bhagat wrote:
> Ping.
> Can someone please review these patches ? We would like to get the
> support for CTF integrated soon.
I'm not sure there's really even consensus that we want CTF support in
GCC. Though I think that the changes you've made in the last several
weeks d
Ping.
Can someone please review these patches ? We would like to get the
support for CTF integrated soon.
Thanks
Indu
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:38 PM Indu Bhagat wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This patch series adds support for CTF generation in GCC.
>
> [Changes from V2]
> - Patch 1, 2, and 3 have mino
18 matches
Mail list logo
