>> Looks safe to me.
>>
>> OK if there are no objections from RMs in the next 24h.
>
> All testing passed so following will be checked in 4.7.
Checked in.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-08/msg00815.html
Thanks, K
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
>
>> I'd like this patch (original version at the bottom) also to be
>> backported into 4.7.
>>
>> Is it safe to backport?
>
> Looks safe to me.
>
> OK if there are no objections from RMs
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
> I'd like this patch (original version at the bottom) also to be
> backported into 4.7.
>
> Is it safe to backport?
Looks safe to me.
OK if there are no objections from RMs in the next 24h.
Thanks,
Uros.
Hi!
I'd like this patch (original version at the bottom) also to be
backported into 4.7.
Is it safe to backport?
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
>
>> Following change enables look ahead feature in the code scheduler f
> OK.
>
Checked in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-08/msg00626.html
Thanks, K
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
> Following change enables look ahead feature in the code scheduler for
> Atom processors. This gives quite reasonable gain for some benchmarks
> for mobile market.
>
> Overall compile time increase for SPEC2000 is about 1%.
>
> Regtested for
