On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 04:24:30PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> * gcc.dg/tree-prof/comp-goto-1.c: Same.
> * gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c: Same.
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/comp-goto-1.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/comp-goto-1.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
> /* { dg-require-e
On Jun 19, 2017, at 2:21 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> The attached patch removes the support for STACK_SIZE in the testcase
> as you suggested, and it works fine (cross-tested on aarch64/arm targets)
>
> OK for trunk?
Ok.
On 12 June 2017 at 16:28, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 06/12/2017 02:28 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On 9 June 2017 at 17:25, Mike Stump wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 9, 2017, at 7:24 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
this patch adds effective target stack_size.
>>>
>>>
OK for trunk i
On 06/12/2017 02:28 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi Tom,
On 9 June 2017 at 17:25, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jun 9, 2017, at 7:24 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
this patch adds effective target stack_size.
OK for trunk if x86_64 and nvptx testing succeeds?
Ok.
The only last issue in this area that I
Hi Tom,
On 9 June 2017 at 17:25, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jun 9, 2017, at 7:24 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> this patch adds effective target stack_size.
>
>> OK for trunk if x86_64 and nvptx testing succeeds?
>
> Ok.
>
> The only last issue in this area that I know about is that there are a few
> m
On Jun 9, 2017, at 7:24 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> this patch adds effective target stack_size.
> OK for trunk if x86_64 and nvptx testing succeeds?
Ok.
The only last issue in this area that I know about is that there are a few more
test cases that need up to 48 MB to run, the problem is that t
