On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 12:28 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 11:16:12AM -0600, Will Schmidt wrote:
> > Noted during review of test results on P9. Due to changes and
> > improvements,
> > our codegen is different for this test on power9.
> > Modified the existin
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 05:23:31PM -0600, Will Schmidt wrote:
> > > /* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc64le-*-* && lp64 } } } */
> > > /* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-darwin* } } */
> > > /* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok } */
> > > -/* { dg-options "-mvsx -O2" } */
> > > +/* { d
On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 12:28 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 11:16:12AM -0600, Will Schmidt wrote:
> > Noted during review of test results on P9. Due to changes and
> > improvements,
> > our codegen is different for this test on power9.
> > Modified the existin
Hi!
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 11:16:12AM -0600, Will Schmidt wrote:
> Noted during review of test results on P9. Due to changes and improvements,
> our codegen is different for this test on power9.
> Modified the existing test to target P8, and added a P9 variant with updated
> counts.
> diff --g
