On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 09:59 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Dez 05 2016, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>
> > What's your target triple?
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2016-12/msg00471.html
>
> Andreas.
>
I *suspect* this is fixable with the addition of this dg- directive to
the fold-vec-ad
On Dez 05 2016, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> What's your target triple?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2016-12/msg00471.html
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
What's your target triple?
> On Dec 4, 2016, at 6:36 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
> On Nov 01 2016, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>
>> * gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-add-7.c: New.
>
> spawn -ignore SIGHUP /daten/gcc/gcc-20161203/Build/gcc/xgcc
> -B/daten/gcc/gcc-20161203/Build/gcc/
> /daten/gcc/gc
On Nov 01 2016, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> * gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-add-7.c: New.
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /daten/gcc/gcc-20161203/Build/gcc/xgcc
-B/daten/gcc/gcc-20161203/Build/gcc/
/daten/gcc/gcc-20161203/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-add-7.c -m32
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -
Hi Bill,
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 09:05:03PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> As Jakub suggested in response to my *ahem* ornate patch for overloaded
> function built-ins, a much better approach is to use the existing
> machinery for overloading and then immediately fold the specific
> functions during
Just a note that the "-std=gnu11" option in the test cases in this patch is a
leftover
from a previous version of the patch, which I'll plan to remove. Sorry for the
oversight!
Bill
> On Nov 1, 2016, at 9:05 PM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As Jakub suggested in response to my *ahem* orna
