On 6/2/21 9:19 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 08:23:48AM -0500, Pat Haugen wrote:
>> On 6/2/21 7:01 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> So did you check the RTL (and alias-sets) produced by
>>> __builtin_return_address? Test coverage might
>>> be low here and w/o scheduling oppo
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 08:23:48AM -0500, Pat Haugen wrote:
> On 6/2/21 7:01 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > So did you check the RTL (and alias-sets) produced by
> > __builtin_return_address? Test coverage might
> > be low here and w/o scheduling opportunities to break things.
>
> __builtin_return
On 6/2/21 7:01 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 1:15 PM Pat Haugen wrote:
>>
>> On 6/2/21 1:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:37 PM Pat Haugen via Gcc-patches
>>> wrote:
Make sure link reg save MEM has frame alias set, to match other link reg
>
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 1:15 PM Pat Haugen wrote:
>
> On 6/2/21 1:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:37 PM Pat Haugen via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Make sure link reg save MEM has frame alias set, to match other link reg
> >> save/restore code.
> >>
> >> Bootstrap/re
On 6/2/21 1:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:37 PM Pat Haugen via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>>
>> Make sure link reg save MEM has frame alias set, to match other link reg
>> save/restore code.
>>
>> Bootstrap/regtest on powerpc64/powerpc64le with no new regressions. Ok for
>> tr
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:37 PM Pat Haugen via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Make sure link reg save MEM has frame alias set, to match other link reg
> save/restore code.
>
> Bootstrap/regtest on powerpc64/powerpc64le with no new regressions. Ok for
> trunk?
>
> -Pat
>
>
> 2021-06-01 Pat Haugen
>
> gc
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 03:34:50PM -0500, Pat Haugen wrote:
> Make sure link reg save MEM has frame alias set, to match other link reg
> save/restore code.
Okay for trunk and any backports (please do at least GCC 11). Thanks!
Segher