On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 08:47:10PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> > > * g++.dg/torture/pr65419.C: New.
> >
> > Maybe you should ask Richi or Jakub about the testcase because you are
> > placing it in a non-target-specific location. It should succeed on
> > all targets, but it may expose la
On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 20:36 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Bill Schmidt
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65914 demonstrates that we
> > fail to match vector predicates with pseudos that are in the virtual
> > stack register rang
On Sat, 2015-06-20 at 13:37 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2015, at 5:36 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> > Maybe you should ask Richi or Jakub about the testcase because you are
> > placing it in a non-target-specific location. It should succeed on
> > all targets, but it may expose latent bug
On Jun 19, 2015, at 5:36 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> Maybe you should ask Richi or Jakub about the testcase because you are
> placing it in a non-target-specific location. It should succeed on
> all targets, but it may expose latent bugs on other targets.
A latent bug is one that is broken, but
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65914 demonstrates that we
> fail to match vector predicates with pseudos that are in the virtual
> stack register range. The reduced test case provided with the bug
> report, when compiled
