Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> >
> > this is the (hopefully) last compatibility problem with libbacktrace on SPU:
> > we do not have either the __sync or the __atomic routines (since the SPU
> > is a fundamentally single-threaded target).
>
> I
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
>
> this is the (hopefully) last compatibility problem with libbacktrace on SPU:
> we do not have either the __sync or the __atomic routines (since the SPU
> is a fundamentally single-threaded target).
I guess I don't understand. These are G