Re: [PATCH, devirtualization] Intraprocedural devirtualization pass

2011-11-02 Thread Richard Guenther
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 11:02:48AM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Martin Jambor wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > the patch below is the second (and last) revived type-based >> > devirtualization patch tha

Re: [PATCH, devirtualization] Intraprocedural devirtualization pass

2011-11-02 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 11:02:48AM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Martin Jambor wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the patch below is the second (and last) revived type-based > > devirtualization patch that did not make it to 4.6.  It deals with > > virtual calls from t

Re: [PATCH, devirtualization] Intraprocedural devirtualization pass

2011-11-02 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > the patch below is the second (and last) revived type-based > devirtualization patch that did not make it to 4.6.  It deals with > virtual calls from the function in which the there is also the object > declaration: > > void foo() > {