Re: [PATCH, V2] Use system default for long double if not specified on PowerPC.

2022-02-09 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Feb 09 2022, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 06:36:57PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> On Feb 08 2022, Peter Bergner wrote: >> > Can you please clarify one thing for me. Do you think it's possible >> > that we can come up with some type of configure patch t

Re: [PATCH, V2] Use system default for long double if not specified on PowerPC.

2022-02-09 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi Andreas, On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 06:36:57PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Feb 08 2022, Peter Bergner wrote: > > Can you please clarify one thing for me. Do you think it's possible > > that we can come up with some type of configure patch that automatically > > sets the long double default

Re: [PATCH, V2] Use system default for long double if not specified on PowerPC.

2022-02-08 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Feb 08 2022, Peter Bergner wrote: > Can you please clarify one thing for me. Do you think it's possible > that we can come up with some type of configure patch that automatically > sets the long double default given something on the system we can test > for or do you think that's impossible an

Re: [PATCH, V2] Use system default for long double if not specified on PowerPC.

2022-02-08 Thread Peter Bergner via Gcc-patches
On 2/4/22 4:26 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > As I said before, I didn't even read the patch, just the one line > summary was enough for a NAK. If the patch in fact does something else, > then it is still incorrect, and needs a very different subject and > summary. > > I hope you see how "using

Re: [PATCH, V2] Use system default for long double if not specified on PowerPC.

2022-02-04 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 02:10:03PM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote: > On 2/4/22 12:03 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 04:43:53PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > >> On Feb 04 2022, Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches wrote: > >>> If the user did not specify a default long double for

Re: [PATCH, V2] Use system default for long double if not specified on PowerPC.

2022-02-04 Thread Peter Bergner via Gcc-patches
On 2/4/22 12:03 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 04:43:53PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> On Feb 04 2022, Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches wrote: >>> If the user did not specify a default long double format when configuring >>> GCC, use the long double default from the host

Re: [PATCH, V2] Use system default for long double if not specified on PowerPC.

2022-02-04 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 04:43:53PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Feb 04 2022, Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches wrote: > > If the user did not specify a default long double format when configuring > > GCC, use the long double default from the host compiler. > > That doesn't make any sense. The

Re: [PATCH, V2] Use system default for long double if not specified on PowerPC.

2022-02-04 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Feb 04 2022, Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches wrote: > If the user did not specify a default long double format when configuring > GCC, use the long double default from the host compiler. That doesn't make any sense. The host compiler can be any random compiler completely unrelated to the tar