Re: [PATCH, SRA] Total scalarization and padding

2011-06-30 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 02:52:36PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Martin Jambor wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:01:17PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Martin Jambor wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > at the moment SRA can get

Re: [PATCH, SRA] Total scalarization and padding

2011-06-29 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:01:17PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Martin Jambor wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > at the moment SRA can get confused by alignment padding and think that > > > it actually contains

Re: [PATCH, SRA] Total scalarization and padding

2011-06-28 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:01:17PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Martin Jambor wrote: > > Hi, > > > > at the moment SRA can get confused by alignment padding and think that > > it actually contains some data for which there is no planned > > replacement and

Re: [PATCH, SRA] Total scalarization and padding

2011-06-28 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > at the moment SRA can get confused by alignment padding and think that > it actually contains some data for which there is no planned > replacement and thus might leave some loads and stores in place > instead of removing them.  This