Re: [PATCH, RFC] Wrong warning message fix for gcc 9

2019-03-29 Thread Jeff Law
On 3/29/19 6:31 AM, zhroma wrote: > Martin Sebor wrote 2019-03-28 22:44: >> On 3/28/19 11:49 AM, Roman Zhuykov wrote: >>> Ping >>> >>> A week ago I decided it is so minor that I can report here with a >>> patch without creating bugzilla PR. >>> Technically it is a "9 regression" in new functionalit

Re: [PATCH, RFC] Wrong warning message fix for gcc 9

2019-03-29 Thread zhroma
Martin Sebor wrote 2019-03-28 22:44: On 3/28/19 11:49 AM, Roman Zhuykov wrote: Ping A week ago I decided it is so minor that I can report here with a patch without creating bugzilla PR. Technically it is a "9 regression" in new functionality added back in summer. Patch was succesfully bootst

Re: [PATCH, RFC] Wrong warning message fix for gcc 9

2019-03-28 Thread Martin Sebor
On 3/28/19 11:49 AM, Roman Zhuykov wrote: Ping A week ago I decided it is so minor that I can report here with a patch without creating bugzilla PR. Technically it is a "9 regression" in new functionality added back in summer. Patch was succesfully bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64. Ok for

Re: [PATCH, RFC] Wrong warning message fix for gcc 9

2019-03-28 Thread Roman Zhuykov
Ping A week ago I decided it is so minor that I can report here with a patch without creating bugzilla PR. Technically it is a "9 regression" in new functionality added back in summer. Patch was succesfully bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64. Ok for trunk? чт, 21 мар. 2019 г. в 18:53, Roman Z