On Mon, 30 May 2016, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 30/05/16 12:56, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 May 2016, Tom de Vries wrote:
> >
> > > >On 30/05/16 11:46, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > > > > >This patch fixes the assert conservatively by aborting graphite
> > > > > code
> > > > > > > > > >gen
On 30/05/16 12:56, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2016, Tom de Vries wrote:
>On 30/05/16 11:46, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >This patch fixes the assert conservatively by aborting graphite code
> > > >generation when encountering a phi with more than two arguments in
> > > >copy_bb_and_sc
On Mon, 30 May 2016, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 30/05/16 11:46, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > This patch fixes the assert conservatively by aborting graphite code
> > > >generation when encountering a phi with more than two arguments in
> > > >copy_bb_and_scalar_dependences.
> > > >
> > > >Bootstrappe
On 30/05/16 11:46, Richard Biener wrote:
This patch fixes the assert conservatively by aborting graphite code
>generation when encountering a phi with more than two arguments in
>copy_bb_and_scalar_dependences.
>
>Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
>
>OK for trunk, 6 branch?
Did you check
On Mon, 30 May 2016, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch fixes graphite PR69068, a 6/7 regression.
>
>
> I.
>
> Consider this test-case:
> ...
> int qo;
> int zh[2];
>
> void
> td (void)
> {
> int ly, en;
> for (ly = 0; ly < 2; ++ly)
> for (en = 0; en < 2; ++en)
> zh[en] =
