On 10/23/13 02:16, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/22/13 03:58, Tom de Vries wrote:
Richard,
This patch adds a missing check for gimple_vdef in stmt_local_def for the
tail-merge pass.
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
OK for trunk, gcc-4_8-branch?
Than
On 10/23/13 10:02, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 22/10/13 20:50, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/22/13 03:58, Tom de Vries wrote:
Richard,
This patch adds a missing check for gimple_vdef in stmt_local_def for the
tail-merge pass.
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
OK for trunk, gcc-4_8-branch?
Thanks,
-
On 22/10/13 20:50, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/22/13 03:58, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> Richard,
>>
>> This patch adds a missing check for gimple_vdef in stmt_local_def for the
>> tail-merge pass.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
>>
>> OK for trunk, gcc-4_8-branch?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> - Tom
>>
>> 2
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Richard,
>
> This patch adds a missing check for gimple_vdef in stmt_local_def for the
> tail-merge pass.
>
> Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
>
> OK for trunk, gcc-4_8-branch?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/22/13 03:58, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > Richard,
> >
> > This patch adds a missing check for gimple_vdef in stmt_local_def for the
> > tail-merge pass.
> >
> > Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
> >
> > OK for trunk, gcc-4_8-branch?
> >
> > Thanks,
On 10/22/13 03:58, Tom de Vries wrote:
Richard,
This patch adds a missing check for gimple_vdef in stmt_local_def for the
tail-merge pass.
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
OK for trunk, gcc-4_8-branch?
Thanks,
- Tom
2013-10-22 Tom de Vries
PR tree-optimization/58805
