Michael Collison writes:
> On 09/14/2015 02:34 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Michael Collison writes:
>>> Here is a modified patch that takes your comments into account. Breaking
>>> on depth == 0 with '>' does not work due to the code looking for whitespace.
>> What goes wrong? Just to make s
On 09/14/2015 02:34 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Michael Collison writes:
Here is a modified patch that takes your comments into account. Breaking
on depth == 0 with '>' does not work due to the code looking for whitespace.
What goes wrong? Just to make sure we're talking about the same thin
Michael Collison writes:
> Here is a modified patch that takes your comments into account. Breaking
> on depth == 0 with '>' does not work due to the code looking for whitespace.
What goes wrong? Just to make sure we're talking about the same thing,
I meant that in:
(match_operand:FOO> ...
Richard,
Here is a modified patch that takes your comments into account. Breaking
on depth == 0 with '>' does not work due to the code looking for whitespace.
2015-08-25 Michael Collison
PR other/57195
* read-md.c (read_name): Allow mode iterators inside angle
brackets in rtl e
Michael Collison writes:
> This patch allow mode iterators inside angle brackets in machine
> description files. I discovered the issue when attempting to use
> iterators on match_operand's as follows:
>
> match_operand: 0 "s_register_operand" "=w")
>
> The function 'read_name' is nor properly han
