On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
> On 08/24/2012 11:46 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>
>> Andrew Pinski writes:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Andrew Pinski
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
>
> On 08/21
On 08/24/2012 11:46 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Andrew Pinski writes:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
On 08/21/2012 02:23 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Would be nice to add a compile test for -mabi=64 just t
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Andrew Pinski writes:
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Sandra Loosemore
>>> wrote:
On 08/21/2012 02:23 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
>
> Would be nice to
Andrew Pinski writes:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Sandra Loosemore
>> wrote:
>>> On 08/21/2012 02:23 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Would be nice to add a compile test for -mabi=64 just to make sure
that Pmode ==
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Sandra Loosemore
> wrote:
>> On 08/21/2012 02:23 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Would be nice to add a compile test for -mabi=64 just to make sure
>>> that Pmode == DImode works. A copy of an exis
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
> On 08/21/2012 02:23 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>
>>
>> Would be nice to add a compile test for -mabi=64 just to make sure
>> that Pmode == DImode works. A copy of an existing test like
>> code-readable-1.c would be fine.
>
>
> I'm havi
Sandra Loosemore writes:
> On 08/21/2012 02:23 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>
>> Would be nice to add a compile test for -mabi=64 just to make sure
>> that Pmode == DImode works. A copy of an existing test like
>> code-readable-1.c would be fine.
>
> I'm having problems with this part -- it seem
Sandra Loosemore writes:
> 2012-08-22 Julian Brown
> Sandra Loosemore
>
> gcc/
> * config/mips/mips.md
> (UNSPEC_CASESI_DISPATCH): New.
> (MIPS16_T_REGNUM): New constant.
> (tablejump): Don't use for MIPS16_SHORT_JUMP_TABLES.
> (casesi): New.
>
On 08/21/2012 02:23 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Would be nice to add a compile test for -mabi=64 just to make sure
that Pmode == DImode works. A copy of an existing test like
code-readable-1.c would be fine.
I'm having problems with this part -- it seems like every combination of
options wi
Sandra Loosemore writes:
> In config/mips/mips.h, there is presently this comment:
>
> /* ??? 16-bit offsets can overflow in large functions. */
> #define TARGET_MIPS16_SHORT_JUMP_TABLES TARGET_MIPS16_TEXT_LOADS
>
> A while ago we had a bug report where a big switch statement did, in
> fact, ove
10 matches
Mail list logo