On 11/09/16 21:53, Peter Bergner wrote:
On 9/11/16 3:35 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
FYI: I have a patch for the aarch64 regression here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39600
It passes bootstrap and reg-testing on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Thanks for debugging and fixing this!
Also t
On 9/11/16 3:35 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
FYI: I have a patch for the aarch64 regression here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39600
It passes bootstrap and reg-testing on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Thanks for debugging and fixing this!
Also the mentioned aarch64 and powerpc test case
FYI: I have a patch for the aarch64 regression here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39600
It passes bootstrap and reg-testing on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Also the mentioned aarch64 and powerpc test cases
pass manually in a cross-compiler, but I cannot do the
boot-strap on powerpc or aarc
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 9/9/16 5:51 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 08/30/2016 10:23 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
>>>
>>> gcc/
>>> PR rtl-optimization/77289
>>> * lra-constraints.c (get_final_hard_regno): Add support for non hard
>>> register numbers. Remove
On 9/9/16 5:51 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 08/30/2016 10:23 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/77289
* lra-constraints.c (get_final_hard_regno): Add support for non hard
register numbers. Remove support for subregs.
(get_hard_regno): Use SUBREG_P. Don't call get_final
On 08/30/2016 10:23 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
PR77289 exposes a latent problem with LRA constraint matching. In the buggy
test cases, LRA performs a speculative register elimination before checking
operands for matching constraints. With the elimination, the operands
appear to match. However, w
Ping this patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg02099.html
Peter
