Hi all,
First hunk is not needed indeed. Testing is ok. Thanks!!!
Here is the final patch:
diff --git a/gcc/configure.ac b/gcc/configure.ac
index 2c17736..43e760b 100644
--- a/gcc/configure.ac
+++ b/gcc/configure.ac
@@ -4566,6 +4566,11 @@ AC_CACHE_CHECK(__stack_chk_fail in target C library,
On 12/05/2012, at 9:03 AM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Please look at the modified patch in the attachment. ChangeLog remains the
> same.
>
> Tested in android environment(x86_64-*-linux-android), also
> bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
> I also started regtesting on linux. Is it ok
Hi!
Please look at the modified patch in the attachment. ChangeLog remains the same.
Tested in android environment(x86_64-*-linux-android), also
bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
I also started regtesting on linux. Is it ok after successfull regtesting?
Thanks,
Igor
On Mon, May 7, 2012
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> On 6/05/2012, at 7:02 PM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> The patch enables stack protector for Android.
>> Android targets don't contain necessary information in features.h so
>> we explicitly enable stack protector for Android.
>>
>> B
On 6/05/2012, at 7:02 PM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The patch enables stack protector for Android.
> Android targets don't contain necessary information in features.h so
> we explicitly enable stack protector for Android.
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64. Ok to commit?
>
> Thanks,
