> I poked at this a little and noticed a difference between the x86_64
> support and the RISC-V support. The RISC-V C language port has char
> as unsigned by default. The x86_64 port has char signed by default.
> If I add a -fsigned-char option, then the testcase works as expected
> for RISC-V.
On 07/13/2018 01:57 AM, Jim Wilson wrote:
I poked at this a little and noticed a difference between the x86_64
support and the RISC-V support. The RISC-V C language port has char
as unsigned by default. The x86_64 port has char signed by default.
If I add a -fsigned-char option, then the testca
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:56 AM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat
wrote:
> I don’t have much more to say than debug11.adb’s comment ;-)
>
>> This testcase checks that in the DWARF description of the variant type
>> below, the C discriminant is properly described as unsigned, hence the
>> 0x5a
>> ('Z') and 0x
On 07/08/2018 12:35 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
I haven't tried looking at the failures yet, and might not spend much
more time on this. Two of them are debug related, and debug support
is a work in progress. I need to finish the native riscv64-linux
support before we can do anything useful there,
> I haven't tried looking at the failures yet, and might not spend much
> more time on this. Two of them are debug related, and debug support
> is a work in progress. I need to finish the native riscv64-linux
> support before we can do anything useful there, and I'd like to get
> back to working
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> You're welcome. Are the 4 remaining failures related to stack checking?
FAIL: gnat.dg/debug11.adb scan-assembler-times 0x5a.*DW_AT_discr_list 1
FAIL: gnat.dg/debug11.adb scan-assembler-times 0x80.*DW_AT_discr_list 1
FAIL: gnat.dg/trampoline4
> I tried adding the missing definition. I now get
>
> === acats Summary ===
> # of expected passes2320
> # of unexpected failures0
>
> === gnat Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes2779
> # of unexpected failures4
> # of ex
> I tried adding the missing definition. I now get
>
> === acats Summary ===
> # of expected passes2320
> # of unexpected failures0
>
> === gnat Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes2779
> # of unexpected failures4
> # of ex
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 12:55 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Ada doesn't use trampolines if you define...
>>
>> > + Always_Compatible_Rep : constant Boolean := False;
>>
>> ...this to False.
>
> And also define TARGET_CUSTOM_FUNCTION_DESCRIPTORS for the architecture.
I tried adding the missing
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 12:16 AM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>> Ada is a low priority side project for me, so if you want non-trivial changes
>> it may be a while before I can get to them. There is a lot of other stuff
>> higher on my priority list at the moment, such as getting native gdb support
>> w
> Ada doesn't use trampolines if you define...
>
> > + Always_Compatible_Rep : constant Boolean := False;
>
> ...this to False.
And also define TARGET_CUSTOM_FUNCTION_DESCRIPTORS for the architecture.
--
Eric Botcazou
> The result is good enough to bootstrap natively and seems to give reasonable
> native testsuite results for a first attempt. The machine I'm running on
> has broken icache flushing, so trampolines won't work, and I suspect that
> is causing a lot of the testsuite failures.
Ada doesn't use tramp
> Ada is a low priority side project for me, so if you want non-trivial changes
> it may be a while before I can get to them. There is a lot of other stuff
> higher on my priority list at the moment, such as getting native gdb support
> working. If this isn't OK as is, then I'm willing to put wor
13 matches
Mail list logo
