> So, FAOD, you're OK with my applying the patch to trunk for gcc-5?
Yes, that's fine.
On 29 Mar 2015, at 20:01, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>> (cd ada/bldtools/sinfo; gnatmake -q xsinfo ; ./xsinfo sinfo.h )
>> raised PROGRAM_ERROR : s-atocou.adb:57 explicit raise
>>
>> Looking at this code, it indicates that it is a dummy implementation for
>> platforms without an atomic increment supp
> (cd ada/bldtools/sinfo; gnatmake -q xsinfo ; ./xsinfo sinfo.h )
> raised PROGRAM_ERROR : s-atocou.adb:57 explicit raise
>
> Looking at this code, it indicates that it is a dummy implementation for
> platforms without an atomic increment support.
>
> hence, I concluded (possibly erroneously) tha
Hi Arnaud,
On 29 Mar 2015, at 19:43, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>> Currently Ada bootstrap is broken for bootstrap compiler == gcc-trunk, and
>> platform == powerpc-darwin9 (although it is possible to bootstrap with
>> gcc-4.9).
>>
>> The reason is that generations of sinfo.h appears now to _require_
> Currently Ada bootstrap is broken for bootstrap compiler == gcc-trunk, and
> platform == powerpc-darwin9 (although it is possible to bootstrap with
> gcc-4.9).
>
> The reason is that generations of sinfo.h appears now to _require_ support
> for atomics (I assume that's intended).
No, that's def
