Re: [PATCH, ARM] Improve robustness of -mslow-flash-data

2018-12-14 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
Hi Thomas, On 11/12/18 16:09, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: Hi Kyrill, I've tested on armeb-none-eabi with -mslow-flash-data for both -mfloat-abi=hard and -mfloat-abi=soft. Both show no regression and the former shows some new PASS. Regarding the part you are hesitant about, the code was taken from

Re: [PATCH, ARM] Improve robustness of -mslow-flash-data

2018-12-11 Thread Thomas Preudhomme
Hi Kyrill, I've tested on armeb-none-eabi with -mslow-flash-data for both -mfloat-abi=hard and -mfloat-abi=soft. Both show no regression and the former shows some new PASS. Regarding the part you are hesitant about, the code was taken from aarch64_reinterpret_float_as_int in config/aarch64/aarch6

Re: [PATCH, ARM] Improve robustness of -mslow-flash-data

2018-11-30 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
Hi Thomas, On 19/11/18 17:56, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: Hi, Current code to handle -mslow-flash-data in machine description files suffers from a number of issues which this patch fixes: 1) The insn_and_split in vfp.md to load a generic floating-point constant via GPR first and move it to VFP re

Re: [PATCH, ARM] Improve robustness of -mslow-flash-data

2018-11-20 Thread Christophe Lyon
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 18:56, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: > > Hi, > > Current code to handle -mslow-flash-data in machine description files > suffers from a number of issues which this patch fixes: > > 1) The insn_and_split in vfp.md to load a generic floating-point > constant via GPR first and move