On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:28 PM, William J. Schmidt
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 16:44 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 3:38 PM, William J. Schmidt
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 15:11 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> >> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Wi
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 16:44 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 3:38 PM, William J. Schmidt
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 15:11 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:26 PM, William J. Schmidt
> >> wrote:
> >> > Sure, I'll give that a try this
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:53 PM, William J. Schmidt
wrote:
> Richard,
>
> While working on the next patch, I ran into a scenario that will apply
> to this one as well. If the call statement that calls powi contains
> vdef/vuse information, it is lost by this replacement. For example,
>
> # .MEM
