Hi Harald,
I agree that the gfc_match_array_ref() is not needed for error recovery or
helps anyhow. I therefore removed it. I left the new error message in, because
in the case that c = x(:)(2:5) is in a subroutine, like in pr102532.f90, then I
get no error. Neither without return MATCH_ERROR nor
Hi Andre,
On 10/7/24 11:04, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
Hi Harald,
thank you for your input. I still have some small nits to discuss to make
everyone happy. Therefore:
this seems to go into the right direction - except that I am not a
great fan of gfc_error_now, as that tries to paper over defic
Hi Harald,
thank you for your input. I still have some small nits to discuss to make
everyone happy. Therefore:
> this seems to go into the right direction - except that I am not a
> great fan of gfc_error_now, as that tries to paper over deficiencies
> in error recovery.
Me either, but when I r
